×

Loading...
Ad by
  • 技多不压身,工到自然成:安省技工证书特训班,点击咨询报名!
Ad by
  • 技多不压身,工到自然成:安省技工证书特训班,点击咨询报名!

满好: 疫苗有自然感染的同等效力,但又避免了自然感染的后遗症。由于Delta变种的超强感染力,估计最后人人都会被感染,类似感冒,尤其对打过疫苗的人来说,但有基础病的病人之类除外。

Delta变种r=6 比原病毒r=2.7 厉害的多。两者的差别如下:

:

Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

  • 枫下家园 / 医药保健 / Major Study: COVID-19 Vaccines Less Effective Against Delta, as Good as ‘Natural Infection’
    The effectiveness of widely used COVID-19 vaccines against the Delta strain becomes weaker within three months of inoculation, said ...
    • 满好: 疫苗有自然感染的同等效力,但又避免了自然感染的后遗症。由于Delta变种的超强感染力,估计最后人人都会被感染,类似感冒,尤其对打过疫苗的人来说,但有基础病的病人之类除外。 +2

      Delta变种r=6 比原病毒r=2.7 厉害的多。两者的差别如下:

      :

      • 我也是太闲,居然读完了。这研究没啥价值,要是真像他们Claim的还那么有效,那还打个屁第三针啊?! +4
    • I don't believe this one. Dr. Peter McCulough clearly said natural immunization is way better than vax. And Israel Data clearly showed that. very few covid recoveries got delta later. +2
    • 假设这个是可信的,那么push曾经被感染后愈痊的人群去打疫苗是什么意思?统计的时候也没见到把这类人群分开,基本可以认为该人群是被归入未打过疫苗的。被感染没症状/确诊的人群按已有数据显示应该更多,push他们去打针又是什么意思?所以仔细想想到处都是坑啊。 +6