重点：
"As of Sunday, Israel had 525 patients in serious condition, 162 more than a week earlier. Of those, 404 are over 60, with 277 of them fully vaccinated."
而你的图表中疫苗的就没超过20.
可能吗？要知道60+疫苗普及率很高！
Loading...
重点：
"As of Sunday, Israel had 525 patients in serious condition, 162 more than a week earlier. Of those, 404 are over 60, with 277 of them fully vaccinated."
而你的图表中疫苗的就没超过20.
可能吗？要知道60+疫苗普及率很高！
如图所示，反疫苗的网友只看到的上面两图：右图是感染数，左图是感染重症述，红色代表没打疫苗的，绿色打了疫苗，看似打疫苗的反而感染数量更多。而实际上，下面两图才反应真实情况：在每100千打疫苗的人中感染数和100千没打疫苗的人中的感染数，这两者相比，才是正确的比较：
这张图也是：
重点：
"As of Sunday, Israel had 525 patients in serious condition, 162 more than a week earlier. Of those, 404 are over 60, with 277 of them fully vaccinated."
而你的图表中疫苗的就没超过20.
可能吗？要知道60+疫苗普及率很高！
上奥数题了！
X=2针率
1*X*1:1*(1-X)*7=277:(404-277)
X=93.45%
好吧，看看以色列60+以上两针到底有没有这么高比例！
狗了一下，这里有：
”Nationally, some 90.2% of Israelis age 90-plus are vaccinated with at least two shots, and for the 80-89 age group the figure is 91.5%. It is even higher, 93.1%, for people in their 70s. But the rates decline among younger age groups: 87.2% for people in their 60s; 84.6 for people in their 50s and 81.2% for people in their 40s.“
https://www.timesofisrael.com/among-older-israelis-serious-covid-rate-six-times-higher-if-unvaccinated/
87.2% for 60-70， 所以60以上的大概是上面几个数的平均。（应该是加权平均但没人口数据只好这样粗算），算90.5%，比上面少3%
如果把上面X改成90.5%，算算上面的7倍会变成啥？
1*X*1:1*(1-90.5%)*Y=277:(404-277)
Y=4.83
好吧，疫苗60+目前还是有将近5倍的保护力。
结论，60以上打疫苗还是有一定好处的。
