Topic: 特丽总算撒手人寰了，通过这个事件，我总算发现了加拿大自由党所谓中间立场的意义。 @枫下论坛 The Rolia Forum

枫下茶话 / 政治经济 / 特丽总算撒手人寰了，通过这个事件，我总算发现了加拿大自由党所谓中间立场的意义。 -vega_lee(天津包子-就不改); 2005-4-1 {626} (#2215035@0)

把握民意，顺应民调。政客你还指望TA什么 -grassofjune(六月草*哥); 2005-4-1 (#2215041@0)
社会本来就是这样的，大多数人不都是摇摆不定，为利所驱，那种黑白分明的政论，可能说起来比较痛快，作起来就比较痛苦，保持相对平衡的社会才是目的，而不是谁对谁错。 -canadacanada(我来学习学习); 2005-4-1 (#2215058@0)

那所有国家都应该是中间模糊势力当权啦，怎么美国是明确右翼，欧洲是明确左翼呢？克林顿明确要加税能当选，布什明确要减税也能当选，克里这个flip-flop就不能当选，怎么加拿大政客就会用模棱两可当选，没别的政治能力和智力了么？ -vega_lee(天津包子-就不改); 2005-4-1 (#2215165@0)

政客的脸都放在第八号当铺里了... -scottee(笑熬浆糊); 2005-4-1 (#2215059@0)
(#2199322)越是在一个成熟的社会，越是成熟的政治体系，其实越是需要政治技巧政治智商， -table(桌子来了); 2005-4-1 (#2215066@0)

点头中。 -llrm(小陳); 2005-4-1 (#2215152@0)
假设一下，如果此事发生在中国，会有什么结果？ -deen(修罗王); 2005-4-1 (#2215155@0)
克林顿明确要加税能当选，布什明确要减税也能当选，克里这个flip-flop就不能当选，怎么加拿大政客就会用模棱两可当选，这就叫政治技巧政治智商么？ -vega_lee(天津包子-就不改); 2005-4-1 (#2215166@0)

the politicans are professional full time job, @_@, they got their own training, besides, a tons of assistants, consultants around them, to vote by human emotion is not good enough to be a politican. -table(桌子来了); 2005-4-1 (#2215254@0)

说的是他们办事的态度，不就是孔孟的中庸之道么？什么“百言百害，不如一默”之类的政治智慧阿，办实事能这个样子么？中国都用了几千年了，用得着他们发挥呀。 -vega_lee(天津包子-就不改); 2005-4-1 (#2215512@0)

你的意思是美国共和党和民主党都缺乏"政治技巧政治智商"了，他们都应该象俺们聪明的自由党学习？因为他们都傻乎乎要么支持要么反对，岂不是要得罪一批人啊。 -seyou(樱花落了郁金香又来了); 2005-4-1 (#2215173@0)

楼上两位，美国的政治家在这件事上必须表态，并不是加拿大的政治家也必须去跳坑阿。 -canadiantire(轮胎-M.I.N.K.); 2005-4-1 (#2215208@0)

在加拿大的3党，最含糊的是新民党。自由党说了：不加税。(别把联邦自由党和安省自由党混了)，保守党说：减税/增加开支(军费)，(除了消减政府其它服务，怎么平衡？)新民党说：想一想another option。。。另外布什政府对同性恋和父母移民什么态度？明确吗？怎么明确的？请教中。 -llrm(小陳); 2005-4-1 {68} (#2215248@0)

在这个个案上，俺站在布什一边。 -llrm(小陳); 2005-4-1 (#2215262@0)
Paul Martin did the same thing about gay marriage, but in the opposite position, very clearly position: he is the solid supporter for it -table(桌子来了); 2005-4-1 (#2215271@0)

Paul Martin's record - In a 1999 congress speech, Mr. Paul Martin called on to fight for the scarified marriage institution, claimed that allowing gary marriage will override the marriage definition.He changed mind just two years ago.

And before Paul Martin became Prime Minister, he advocated strongly joing US missile defense program. He changed his stand this year again, and he showed his cowardice at this matter - when he made up his dicision he dared not to tell Mr. Bush personally when they were together in Belgim, but instead have the foreign affiairs minister to tell Ms rice. Liberal party in Canada is like communist party in China, its leaders are cowards. -cerboros(Once Upon Great King); 2005-4-1 {476} (#2215322@0)

父母移民的政策当然很明确，很多大侠不都举的美国的例子反对么？有就是有，没有就没有，有这样的政策又不办事，就是失职 -vega_lee(天津包子-就不改); 2005-4-1 (#2215434@0)

Canadian is lack of leadership and never stands on her own feet. She sued to follow britain, and now Aemrica. Maybe american politician is not welcome, but they are strong leaders -goodlord(goodlord); 2005-4-1 (#2215312@0)

If Canada has a strong leader , the canadian would be lucky . -ofuture(ofuture); 2005-4-3 (#2218317@0)

We need to open our eyes very big to choose a better leader that fit all Cabadians during the election time, not only for oneself. -ofuture(ofuture); 2005-4-4 (#2219610@0)

at least, Canada did not join American army for the war in Iraq, thinking about the fact: many countries sent their army to Iraq according to the order from U.S., you call this 'never stand on her own feet' ? -table(桌子来了); 2005-4-4 (#2219766@0)

你知道BUSH 兄弟在帮倒忙吗. 三权分立是最基本的宪法原则. 他们两公开和法院对着干, 是捞过界, 是不尊重宪法. 这种做法很容易激起法院的反感. -rochester(小风轻轻吹); 2005-4-1 (#2215320@0)

Topic